Feedback from Peer Review Circles
Click the button below to start.
Question 1 of 16
Assigned Peer Review Circle Number
Question 2 of 16
Upload Public Announcement
Question 3 of 16
Purpose of Announcement
Exploration Target
Exploration Result
Scoping Study
Mineral Resource - Initial
Mineral Resource - Update
Pre-Feasibility Study
Feasibility Study
Ore Reserves
Production Update
Annual Update
Quarterly Update
Question 4 of 16
Overall Assessment
Exceeds requirements
Meets requirements
Partially meets requirements
Does not meet requirements
Question 5 of 16
Overall Assessment of Public Announcement
Question 6 of 16
Key Observations: Regulatory Issues
JORC Table 1 non-compliance
Inadequate cautionary language
Forward-looking statement concerns
Other:
Question 7 of 16
Comments on Regulatory Issues
Question 8 of 16
Key Observations: Technical Issues
Unsupported assumptions
Misleading or unclear resource/reserve classification
Data quality / QAQC concerns
Missing or unclear methodology
Other
Question 9 of 16
Comments on Technical Issues
Question 10 of 16
Key Observations: Materiality and Market Communication
Material information omitted or obscured
Market sensitivity not adequately addressed
Excessive technical complexity or jargon
Question 11 of 16
Comments on Materiality and Market Communication
Question 12 of 16
Examples of Good Practice
Clear and balanced communication
Strong transparency in assumptions and limitations
Effective use of diagrams/maps/tables
Compliance with both Code and intent
Question 13 of 16
Comments on Examples of Good Practice
Question 14 of 16
Recommendation
Flag for CQP Committee follow-up
Suggest development of MRA Guidance Note
Refer for deeper review (e.g. PRP or CDOC pathway)
No further action needed
Question 15 of 16
Optional Comments or Suggestions:
Question 16 of 16
Confidentiality & Declaration
We confirm this report reflects the consensus of the Peer Review Circle and contains no personal or attributed comments.